http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/inching-closer-to-scalable-quantum-computing/ thoughts of a selective subjectivist Tue, 21 May 2013 14:36:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/inching-closer-to-scalable-quantum-computing/#comment-217 Mon, 05 May 2008 00:41:41 +0000 http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-217 Are you asking how the entanglement itself is measured or asking how they know the entanglement is due to their setup? Or are you asking whether they’re interpreting the results in a biased way? In any of those cases, one presumes they are using methods that are standard and well-accepted in the QI community. I’ve only read the news releases on it, but they wouldn’t (shouldn’t) have made it past peer-review if questions such as yours weren’t directly addressed.

]]> http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/inching-closer-to-scalable-quantum-computing/#comment-216 Thu, 01 May 2008 15:24:20 +0000 http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-216 ” There is some work to be done, of course, even on this particular setup. For example, the photons only become entangled about 1/9 of the time.”
How you know they are entangled? Maybe just probabilistic acsident?

]]>