<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fact for September 18, 2008 &#8211; why manhole covers are round</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/fact-for-september-18-2008-why-manhole-covers-are-round/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/fact-for-september-18-2008-why-manhole-covers-are-round/</link>
	<description>thoughts of a selective subjectivist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: quantummoxie</title>
		<link>http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/fact-for-september-18-2008-why-manhole-covers-are-round/#comment-3687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quantummoxie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/?p=387#comment-3687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that in three dimensions you can still get an equilateral triangle to work its way through, though I&#039;m not absolutely positive of that.  If I&#039;m wrong then the conjecture would be true for any &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;-dimensional polygon when &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; &gt; 3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that in three dimensions you can still get an equilateral triangle to work its way through, though I&#8217;m not absolutely positive of that.  If I&#8217;m wrong then the conjecture would be true for any <i>n</i>-dimensional polygon when <i>n</i> &gt; 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Palmer</title>
		<link>http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/fact-for-september-18-2008-why-manhole-covers-are-round/#comment-3686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Palmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quantummoxie.wordpress.com/?p=387#comment-3686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t an equilateral triangle work as well as a circle?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t an equilateral triangle work as well as a circle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
